Señor Grumblecakes (jervo) wrote,
Señor Grumblecakes
jervo

So I'm currently reading Anathem, which I'm very much enjoying, and I'm in the middle of this one particular section, and I had to stop because it's basically disc theory.  The LJ entry I just linked to is not very well written, and I feel like I've described it in this blog better, but I don't particularly feel like digging through 6 years of archives to see if I actually did.

It's been a long time since I ever did any serious pontificating w/r/t disc theory, and so it was refreshing (and certainly illuminating) to see someone else describe it much better than I ever could.

If you're curious, the part I'm talking about concerns the narrator's introduction to the Kelx, p. 467-471.  As I literally just finished reading these pages, I have no idea if the Kelx end up being baby-rapers or are otherwise bad people.  Likewise, I'm not ready to go ahead and consider this a spoiler, either, since I have no way of knowing how relevant the Kelx are to the overall plot.  As I'm only aware of one of you who've already finished the book, please feel free to leave a comment telling me if I've ruined the book for anyone.

Subscribe

  • Farewell, LJ

    So I guess I'm retiring this blog. Part of me feels like I need to make some sort of eulogy or something; part of me just wants to move on already.…

  • Catching up

    The first sentence of this post was "Finally, some breathing room," and then as I was in the middle of the second sentence I got handed…

  • (no subject)

    Kinda hard to imagine Thomas Pynchon (and not, say, Tom Robbins) writing this paragraph, but there it is on p. 99 of "Inherent Vice":…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments